Independent Investigation
An independent investigation begins with a focused question rather than a ready-made answer. You select relevant sources, compare what they contribute, organise the evidence and build a conclusion that reflects both the findings and their limitations. The process combines reading, source evaluation, synthesis and formal communication.
- Level 3
Understand
Start with a focused question
A useful investigation question should be open enough to require analysis but narrow enough to answer within the time and length available.
Too broad: How does technology affect society?
More focused: How has generative AI changed the way upper-secondary students approach written assignments?
Define the scope
Decide what your investigation will and will not cover.
Possible boundaries include:
- time period
- age group
- country or context
- type of source
- particular aspect of the topic
Search strategically
Use several search terms and adjust them as your understanding develops.
A useful source is not simply one that mentions your topic. It should contribute evidence, background, a perspective or a method relevant to your question.
Evaluate sources
For each source, ask:
- Who produced it?
- What is its purpose?
- What evidence does it use?
- How current and relevant is it?
- What population or context does it cover?
- What limitations matter for my question?
Build a source map
Do not organise your notes only as Source A, Source B and Source C.
Create themes or sub-questions and place evidence from different sources under them.
This prepares you to synthesise rather than write separate source summaries.
Develop a conclusion from the evidence
A conclusion should answer the question as far as the evidence allows.
It may be qualified:
The available evidence suggests..., particularly in..., although...
A qualified conclusion is often stronger than an absolute claim that ignores uncertainty.
Choose an appropriate final form
Depending on the task, the investigation could be presented as an essay, report, presentation or another formal format.
The format changes, but the underlying requirements remain: clear question, relevant evidence, source transparency and a supported conclusion.
Example
Question
How does short-form video influence the way young people discover news?
Possible source roles
- A survey provides data about where young people encounter news.
- A research article examines attention and short-form media.
- A journalism organisation explains how it adapts news for video platforms.
- A source-critical article discusses misinformation risks.
Possible synthesis
The sources might collectively suggest that short-form video increases incidental exposure to news while also changing how much context users receive. The conclusion would need to distinguish between discovering news, understanding it and evaluating its reliability.
How to do it
- Choose a topic and turn it into a focused investigation question.
- Define the scope and key terms.
- Plan several search terms and possible source types.
- Select sources for relevance and quality, not simply because they agree with each other.
- Record source details immediately.
- Take notes by theme or sub-question.
- Compare claims, evidence, scope and limitations.
- Draft a structure based on ideas rather than source order.
- Integrate and reference evidence clearly.
- Write a conclusion that answers the question at an appropriate level of certainty.
- Review whether your evidence actually supports the conclusion.
Common mistakes
Choosing the answer before researching
If you search only for evidence supporting your original opinion, the investigation becomes confirmation rather than inquiry.
Question too broad
A broad topic often produces a shallow final text. Narrow the population, context, time period or aspect.
Collecting sources without a plan
More sources do not automatically create a stronger investigation. Each source should have a clear role.
Source-by-source structure
Three separate source summaries do not show synthesis. Organise the investigation around themes and relationships.
Conclusion stronger than evidence
Do not turn limited or context-specific evidence into a universal claim.
Try it
Which investigation question is most workable for a short source-based project?
- A. Is technology good or bad?
- B. How has social media changed everything?
- C. How do two major news organisations adapt the same international news story for short-form video?
- D. What is the internet?
Answer: C. It is focused, comparative and narrow enough to investigate with a manageable set of sources.
Key points
- Begin with a focused question, not a fixed conclusion.
- Define the scope before collecting large amounts of material.
- Select sources for relevance, evidence and perspective.
- Organise notes by ideas rather than by source.
- Synthesis explains relationships between sources.
- Your conclusion should reflect the scope and limitations of the evidence.
- Reference source material consistently and transparently.
Related guides
Continue with a related guide.
Comparing Sources
Compare what different sources say, how they support their claims and why their perspectives may differ.
Read the guideReading & AnalysisSynthesising Multiple Sources
Bring ideas from several sources together to build a new, evidence-based understanding of a question.
Read the guideWritingReferencing & Attribution
Show clearly where information and ideas come from and use a consistent way of acknowledging sources.
Read the guideWritingReports & Proposals
Organise findings, analysis and recommendations in a clear formal structure for a specific reader and purpose.
Read the guide