Comparing Sources
Comparing sources means more than saying that two texts are similar or different. You need to identify the issue they address, compare their claims and evidence, and consider how purpose, context and perspective may shape what each source emphasises.
- Level 2
- Level 3
Understand
Compare the same thing
A useful comparison needs a shared question.
If one source explains why a policy was introduced and another describes public reactions, they may not actually disagree. They may be answering different questions.
Claims
Identify what each source is saying about the issue.
Ask where the claims overlap, where they differ and how strong each claim is.
Evidence
Sources may rely on statistics, interviews, expert opinion, examples, historical documents or personal experience.
The evidence affects what kind of conclusion a source can reasonably support.
Purpose and perspective
A research report, campaign text and personal essay can discuss the same issue for different purposes.
Purpose does not automatically make a source unreliable, but it can help explain selection, emphasis and language.
Reliability and relevance
Ask whether the source is appropriate for the specific question you are investigating.
A reliable source can still be irrelevant, and a relevant source can still have limitations.
Example
Source A is a national survey showing that reported loneliness among young adults has increased.
Source B is an interview with one student who says social media helps them feel less isolated.
These sources do not necessarily contradict each other. Source A describes a population-level pattern, while Source B gives one person's experience. A comparison should explain the different kinds of evidence before drawing a conclusion.
How to compare
- Write one question that both sources help you investigate.
- Identify each source's main claim about that question.
- Compare the evidence each source uses.
- Consider purpose, audience and context.
- Identify genuine agreement and genuine disagreement.
- Explain whether the differences may come from evidence, definitions, perspective or scope.
- Conclude what the sources together allow you to say.
Useful language
- Both sources suggest that...
- Whereas Source A emphasises..., Source B focuses on...
- The sources differ mainly in...
- This difference may reflect...
- Source A provides broader evidence, while Source B offers...
- Taken together, the sources indicate...
Common mistakes
Source-by-source summary
Writing one paragraph about Source A and then one about Source B often produces two summaries rather than a comparison.
Organise the discussion around points of comparison instead.
Different means contradictory
Sources can emphasise different aspects without making incompatible claims.
Choosing a winner too quickly
A comparison is not always about deciding which source is 'best'. Different sources can be useful for different purposes.
Key points
- Compare sources through a shared question.
- Examine claims and evidence, not only conclusions.
- Different source types can provide different kinds of knowledge.
- Purpose and perspective can explain differences in emphasis.
- Separate genuine contradiction from different scope or focus.
Related guides
Continue with a related guide.
Synthesising Multiple Sources
Bring ideas from several sources together to build a new, evidence-based understanding of a question.
Read the guideReading & AnalysisAnalysing Non-fiction
Analyse purpose, audience, argument, evidence and language in non-fiction texts.
Read the guideWritingSummarising Sources
Reduce a source to its essential ideas while keeping the meaning accurate and clearly separated from your own ideas.
Read the guideWritingQuoting & Integrating Evidence
Use quotations, paraphrases and source information as part of your own reasoning instead of dropping evidence into a paragraph.
Read the guide